Quantcast
RSS
 

Archive for the ‘PR’ Category

Your Daily Awesome – Rick Astley

02 Sep

Long-time readers may be aware of my somewhat unhealthy obsession with Rick Astley’s music.  I mean, Rick Astley DID teach me everything I need to know about social media!

Make sure you click on the link, because it kick-started the “Awesome” phase of this blog, further developed here.  And of course, we are still very much awesome these days, with the “Your Daily Awesome” series in high gear.

So with that being said, this was an awesome morning.  I opened up my laptop and had a message from my friend Matt LaCasse (by the way, make sure you check out his fantastic blog, with great insights on sports, PR and #cookchat!).

Matt informed me that Rick Astley had just released new music!!

His VERY AWESOME single “Lights Out” was leaked in June, but now it’s officially released, so here it is!

And here’s a special “Bonus Awesome:” Rick Astley and Tony Hadley, singing “Don’t Cha,” by the Pussycat Dolls. This is just too much awesome!

Popularity: 2% [?]

 

SLIDES: Social Media Integration for Non-Profits

24 Aug

Here are the slides from the presentation Kelly Stewart and I gave at the ASAE Annual Meeting on August 24, 2010 – focusing on how non-profits and associations can integrate social media into their overall communications plan.  Enjoy!

Popularity: 5% [?]

 

Bad PR: My Letters to Delta

20 Aug

Recently, I had a horrible experience flying Delta from Baltimore to Lansing (with a changeover in Detroit).  I

Businessman with face pressed against wall, profile, close-up

outlined my complaints in a letter to their customer service department.  What follows is my original letter, their response, and my reply to them.  As a PR pro, I consider this a FAIL.  I’ll let you see why below.

Look at the elements in my letter that are NOT addressed in their response.
————————

1) My Original Letter

COMMENT DETAILS:

Email about Past/Future travel: Past
Nature of Comment: Complaint Concern
Email Pertaining to: Flight_Delay_Cancellation
Email about Other topic:

Comments:

To Whom It May Concern:

My name is Mike Schaffer and I was involved in the Baltimore-to-Detroit fiasco on Saturday.  The original flight was set to take off at 7:30am, but was  delayed due to a mechanical error.  Parts had to be flown in for the repairs. At that point, the completely full plane of passengers had to be rebooked on other flights.  Personally, I spent SEVEN hours at BWI, spoke to four counter agents (most of whom didn’t appear to care about the situation) and called the “helpful” customer service line countless times, with mixed results.

At one point, the customer service person on the phone, after spending 10 minutes with me about my dissatisfaction with the entire experience, actually tried to get me to sign up for the American Express card!  I couldn’t believe it.

I was also given a $7 meal voucher, that the main restaurant in the concourse would not accept, because they claim that “Delta doesn’t pay their bills.”

This was a frustrating, infuriating experience, which cost me nearly 1/3 of my hard-earned vacation time.  And the only compensation I received was a voucher I could not redeem.

To make matters worse, when I got to Detroit, I had to wait THREE hours for the next flight to Lansing, bringing my total travel time to 14 hours, when it should have been just 4.

I have no interest in SkyMiles or Delta credit.  Your airline cost me precious time with loved ones that I will not be able to get back.  My experience was horrid and I do not wish to fly with you again.

My only request is a full refund of my Baltimore-to-Lansing flights on 8/14, which I feel is fair compensation for a horrible day of travel because of your inability to provide alternative flight arrangements and lack of customer service.

Sincerely,
- Michael Schaffer
Would you like a reply to your e-mail?:yes  [NOTE FROM MIKE - I HAD TO CHECK A BOX TO ENSURE I GOT A RESPONSE!]

2) Delta’s Response:

Dear Mr. Schaffer:

RE: Case Number [REDACTED]

Thank you for writing about your flight experience on August 14.  On
behalf of Delta Air Lines, I would like to extend our sincere apology
for your delayed arrival into Lansing, as well as for the unsatisfactory
customer service you encountered from our team at Baltimore.

I clearly understand the frustration you experienced and acknowledge
your shortened vacation time when Flight 2137 was cancelled for
mechanical reasons.  Feedback like you have provided will help us to
improve our overall customer experience.  Be assured your comments will
be shared with our Airport Customer Service leadership team at Baltimore
for internal follow up.

Since your airfare was used, albeit with a delayed arrival on August 14,
a refund of your airfare would not be due.  However, as a gesture of
goodwill, I have reserved an Electronic Transportation Credit Voucher
(eTCV) in the amount of $100.00 for you.  Please note the voucher number
and associated Terms and Conditions are shown below.  Please keep the
voucher number since it is required for redemption.  I understand you
may not be traveling with us in the upcoming year.  As such, it is
important to mention that the voucher is fully transferable to a friend
or family member.

I want to thank you, again, for taking the time to write.  Your future
business is important to us, and I hope you will reconsider your views
of Delta Air Lines and choose us for your future air travel needs.

Sincerely,

Kathy Johnston
Coordinator, Customer Care
Delta Air Lines/KLM Royal Dutch Airlines

3) My Reply:

Dear Ms. Johnston,

Thank you for your response.

While I do appreciate the “gesture” of a $100 travel voucher, I do not find that to be a suitable remedy for the situation.

To say that a refund is not due because I actually got form “Point A” to “Point B” certainly protects your company from going bankrupt, I would assume, but is horrible customer relations.  The experience I had, from losing a full day of vacation to a food voucher I couldn’t use in your own terminal at BWI (the Wendy’s in Detroit’s airport was kind enough to accept it…8 hours after it was first handed to me), is certainly worth a refund of my Saturday flights.

If you disagree, then it is apparent that you do not, as you said, “clearly understand the frustration.”

Another frustration is that when I originally submitted my letter, I was told a response may take up to 30 days.  I am a businessman, and when a customer is dissatisfied, I prefer to handle the matter that day, or as soon as humanly possible.  For your benefit, I sincerely hope that most instances are reviewed more promptly than that.

I will commend your @DeltaAssist Twitter community manager who was most helpful in many ways, including moving my message from the bottom of the 30-day list.

I do hope you or your supervisors will reconsider my reasonable request for the full refund for Saturday’s flight and I may reconsider flying Delta again in the future.

Best,
Mike Schaffer

Popularity: 24% [?]

 

JetBlue – Right Things, Wrong Ways

11 Aug

There’s a difference between a PR crisis and a legal crisis.

Flight attendant with an oxygen mask

When PR crap hits the fan, you get out in front of it, quash rumors, blame those at fault and try to move past it.

However, when legal proceedings are involved, things take a slightly more dramatic turn.  A company really can’t open their collective mouth about what’s happening, so as to not impede the impair the investigation.  You know the drill: silence is golden.

PR is an art, not a science, and Exhibit A right now is JetBlue.

You know the story: flight attendant allegedly got into a possibly physical altercation with a passenger, showed a potty mouth and dangerously (yet hilariously), stole some beer for the drink cart, and used the inflatable escape slide to de-plane.  He was arrested at his residence a short time later (allegedly in the midst of intercourse), and charged with crimes that could add up to seven years in jail.  One of them being “criminal mischief,” which, if not illegal, would sound kind of fun.

JetBlue suspended him and has since gone relatively silent.  Wherein lies the problem.

Let’s go one-by-one at how they are doing the right things, but the wrong way.

Right Thing: Suspend the Accused Good move!  Get him off the schedule while this matter is sorted out.

Wrong Way: Why did they wait until the NEXT DAY to suspend him?  Isn’t that something they should have done…I don’t know…immediately?  Let’s get this down so everyone understands.  If an employee allegedly fights with a customer, curses out hundreds more, steals from you and uses illegal procedures to exit, you do NOT need to wait to suspend them.  Got it?

Right Thing: Reimburse the Affected JetBlue is giving everyone on that flight a $100 travel voucher.

Wrong Way: In the statement their spokesman gave to CNN, he said:

“This is consistent with our long standing policies,” spokesman Steve Stampley told CNN. “JetBlue often provides vouchers to our customers when they experience a disruption or otherwise abnormal circumstance. This event falls into that category.”

Wow…way to make this generous “we’re sorry” sound as cold and robotic as possible.  How about something like, “This type of service is not representative of JetBlue’s industry-leading standards.  We invite everyone who was on that flight to give us another try, using a $100 voucher we are sending to them this week, with no blackout dates or restrictions.  Again, we deeply apologize and assure everyone this is not how JetBlue operates.”

See?  That wasn’t so hard.

Right Thing: Don’t comment. If a legal investigation is on-going, an agency can not discuss it.  Good on JetBlue for keeping everything quiet.

Wrong Way: In a tweet to a CNN reporter asking about the situation, JetBlue responded: “@brookebcnn We will not comment further on ongoing investigations.”  I know that inflection is hard to get across in text, but…really?

Try this:  “@brookebcnn Since there is a legal investigation, we can’t comment now, but will when we are legally able.”  See how that comes off as nicer and warmer?  It accomplished the exact same goal, but leaves readers with a better feeling of your brand.

Another example is how they engaged comedian Andy Borowitz, who was needling them online.  Don’t give a comedian extra bullets to hit you with.  That’s just bad business.  Let him make his joke about you and let the 24-hour news cycle wash everything away.

Several days in, how do YOU think JetBlue is handling this from a PR perspective?

Popularity: 9% [?]

 

You Are Not Your Audience

09 Aug

In the marketing, advertising and PR world, we do a lot of difficult things.  And before you make a Mad Men joke

hushing businessman

about 4 drink lunches and hyper-loaded expense accounts, let me just quash that.  It may have happened in the 1950s, but if it exists on a normal basis in 2010, please point me in that direction!

One of the hardest things to do, though, is separate yourself from your audience.

Basically, you are not your audience.

You, Mr./Ms. Communicator, are hyper-sensitive to your brand, your industry and your marketing channels.

You pay more attention to most everything associated with your company that any current or potential customer.

You have access to studies and seminars and surveys on why Ad X or Press Release Y WILL work.

You also tend to base your campaigns on how YOU feel about it or how it makes YOU feel.

You probably live somewhere else, eat different things and have a different overall lifestyle than your consumers.

We all do it…it’s human nature, to wish that everyone viewed the world the same way we do.

That means the secret to an effective campaign is removing yourself from the equation.  Think like your audience, think about what motivates them, think about how your brand REALLY fits into their life.

In the new digital age, it is even more important to act this way, because the marketing world can be several months ahead of where people are.

Case in point: Geo-Location.  Despite it being a hot marketing vehicle, only 4% of Americans have ever used FourSquare, GoWalla or a similar service.  Also, a whopping 84% of Americans had never even HEARD of such a thing.  Yes, this will grow, but how much time and effort should marketers be spending on a medium that 4/5 of the country has never even heard of?  Each marketer will have to do their own calculus to figure out if it’s worth their time.

I am going to venture to say that the 16% of the people who know of Geo-Location are mostly techies or communicators.  In this case, we are WAAAAAY ahead of the curve.

My best advice for you, my marketing friends, is to get to know your customer as much as possible.  Know who they are, where they come from, what they respond to, and then build programs and initiatives that impact them.  And, as hard as it may be, remove yourself from the equation.

Popularity: 15% [?]

 
 

TNA Hardcore Justice – I don’t get it.

07 Aug

What do you think would happen if McDonald’s decided to temporarily remove their signature Big Mac burger Amazing RED / Motor City Machine Gun contre Suicide - TNA Wrestling Tour 2010 - Zenith de Paris - 25.01.2010 - Catch - hauteur action duel oppositionand replaced it with the McRib, an old menu item that is fondly remembered, but in retrospect, wasn’t all that great to begin with?

Mutiny, right?

In essence, that it was professional wrestling outfit TNA is doing this weekend, as they have basically donated their annual “Hard Justice” pay-per-view show to some old “stars” of Extreme Championship Wrestling. ECW was a small, regional promotion that ran in Philadelphia in the mid 1990s, but gained industry acclaim for their progressive storylines, innovative wrestling and garbage brawls. It was eventually bought out by Vince McMahon’s WWE, who put on a true reunion show and eventually rebooted the brand as a mixture of veterans and young rising grapplers.

So, why in the world would TNA look to revive a brand that their biggest competitor not only owns, but put an end to?

And why would they spend a month promoting a dead brand, effectively pushing the pause button on their own?

From a PR perspective, here are the major blunders:
1) Pushing a one-night show involving talent now associated with your brand as being more important than your ongoing storylines and characters basically tells the audience not to care about your product.

2) ECW is dead for a reason. While they were ahead-of-their-time, the organization was never able to achieve widespread mainstream acclaim. In fact, when they had opportunities, they dropped the ball.

3) This was obviously done last minute, since long-lead advertising vehicles still don’t reflect the change. My cable carrier is showing commercials for the show as if it still had TNA’s core roster on it. So, they are creating confusion among their own fanbase.

4) TNA tapes two weeks of TV shows at a time. Because of the on-the-fly booking of talent, they were only able to announce two matches for Sunday’s show. What fan in a struggling economy will pay for a product when they have no idea what to expect?

5) And, most importantly, WWE’s corporate legal team is now ready to pounce on TNA. They have fiercely protected their trademarks over the years, even the dormant ones. Good luck with that, TNA.

So, even though I was a fan of the original ECW, I can’t support a company so clearly shooting themselves in their PR foot. I will not be watching.

Popularity: 12% [?]